At a Vestry held on Friday the 3d of April 1761
.
Present Mr Henry Newton< no role >
Capt Willm Wilde< no role >
} Church Wardens
Mr George Maynard< no role >
Mr Jas Hebert< no role >
Junr Mr Peter Pope< no role >
Mr Richard James< no role >
Mr James Dunn< no role >
Mr John Chauntrell< no role >
Mr John Haydon< no role >
Mr John Roberts< no role >
Mr John Perkins< no role >
Mr Saml Mestrezatt< no role >
Mr Joseph Chorley< no role >
Mr Alexr Bellis< no role >
Mr John Moggridge< no role >
Mr James Cue Mr Henry Rutt< no role >
Mr William Martin< no role >
Mr William Towsey< no role >
Mr Wm Farnworth< no role >
Mr Peter Culver< no role >
Mr Thomas Hudson< no role >
Mr Benjn Lucas< no role >
Mr Robt Scouthroupe< no role >
Mr Josh: Richardson< no role >
Mr John Hawkins< no role >
Mr Francis Leach< no role >
Mr Aeneas Mc Millan Mr Michl: Cole< no role >
Mr Henry Gretton< no role >
Mr Clement Lazell< no role >
Mr Thos: Pullen< no role >
Mr Thos Wright< no role >
Mr John Jeffryes< no role >
Mr Saml: Hulme< no role >
Mr Thos Fothergill Mr Josh: Spackman Mr Willm Coombes< no role >
Mr John Hayward< no role >
Mr Stephen Line< no role >
Mr Chas Long< no role >
Mr Edwd Tredway< no role >
& others
Sextoness
This Vestry was held pursuant to Publick
Notice given in the Church for the Choice of a Sexton or
Sextoness of this parish
At which time Mr Maynard Acquainted the Genl
present that before they proceeded to a Choice it woud
be Necessary to take the Sense of this Vestry as to the
Method of proceeding He therefore Moved that the Choice
of a Sexton or Sextoness for this parish might be
determined by a Ballott And being Seconded the Question
was put on the said Motion and carryed in the Affirmative
Election by
Ballot.
Ordered that the Choice for a Sexton or Sextoness
of this parish be determined by a Ballott
Then the several petitions of Sarah Parker< no role > This name instance is in set 1455.
Widow
Caleb Lee< no role >
, Richard Moore< no role >
, Thomas Oswin< no role >
, John
Iselton, and John Willson< no role >
were delivered in at the
Table and Ordered to be read and the same were read
accordingly
Then some of the Gentlemen present took Notice
that Thomas Oswin< no role >
one of the petitioners was no
Parishioner and therefore not a fit person in their