proof before the
therefore objected
the Respondents
of not proved it
might not to be
staled
This was fully proved

reside in the said Parish,until the September to Living & thenand afterwardsdied leaving
the sd Second Mary Duffel< no role > him Surviving who contained
to reside in the said Parish of Hampton [..] and who
on the Eighth Day of August One thousand seven
hundred and ninety one took Barbara Reed< no role > an
Apprentice being a Poor Girl of the Parish of Saint
Martin in the Fields who was regularly bound
Her by Indicating by the Parish Officers of
Saint Martins till she should attain the life of
Twenty one Years or Day of Marriage The Apprentice served underthe
Indenture of Apprenticeship in the said Parish of
Hampton tillfor upwards of Forty Days
which Her sd Mistress (the second) Mary Duffell< no role > died

Whereupon sd two Justices removed the said Barbara
Reed< no role > (the apprentice) back to the said Parish of Saint
Martins on the Ground that she gained no setting
as Hampton her proceeding next apprenticeship which Mary
Duffell she being the Widow of James Duffell< no role > who
Resided at Hampton under the before mentioned
Certificate-Upon an Appeal to the Sessions the
the Orders were quashedThe Justices being of
Opinion that the Pauper did gained of Settlement by
her apprenticeship with the said Mary Duffell< no role > in
the said Parish of Hampton because the said
Mary Duffell< no role > was not the Mary Duffell mentioned
in the Certificate with the said James Duffell< no role >
but his the Second Wife with whom he Intermarried
after the Death of his first Wife and after the
granting the Certificate and the said Apprentice being as
part of his Family

Mr G

W. Garrow for Respd. [..]