Middlesex Sessions:
Sessions Papers - Justices' Working Documents
SM | PS

February 1765

About this document type

Currently Held: London Metropolitan Archives

LL ref: LMSMPS505450012

Image 12 of 14


Middx


At the General Session of the Peace of our Lord the King holden
for the County of Middlesex at Hicks Hall in Saint John Street in
the said County (by adjournment) on Thursday the Twentyeighth day of
February in the Fifth year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord-
George the Third King of Great Britain etc Before Thomas Lane< no role >
George Errington< no role > , Saunders Welch< no role > John Brettell< no role > Gerrard Howard< no role > Esquires
and other their Fellows Justices of our said Lord the King Assigned
to keep the Peace in the County aforesaid and also to hear and
Determine divers Felonies Trespasses and other Misdemeanours
committed in the same County.

Whereas Edward Danaby< no role > of the Parish of Saint James Clerkwenwell in the-
County of Middlesex Kath at this present Session Exhibited his Petition and-
appeal Setting forth That the Petition was Convicted on the 8th. Day of February
instant before John Spinnage< no role > Esquire one of his Majestys Justices of the Peace
for the said County of Certain offence supposed to have been done and Committed-
by the Petition in Exposing to Sale and Setting on the Seventh day of the same
Month in the said Parish of saint James Clerkwenwell two Quartern Leaves of-
Wheatten Bread not being well made contrary to the Form of the Statute in that Case-
made and provided and was thereupon Adjudged to pay and Forfeit for the same the Sum
of Ten pounds That the Petitioner thinking himself Aggrieved by the Judgment of the
said Justices (being intirely Innecent of the Offence so Charged upon him) did enter
into a Recognizance with two sufficient Sureties to appeal to their Worships and to
prosecute this Appeal with Effect and to be forth Coming to abide the Judgement and
Determination of the Court in the Premisses according to the Direction of the said
Statute The Petitioner therefore humbly Appealed against the said Judgment of the
said Justice and prayed that the same Conviction Might be Quashed And that he-
might be discharged therefrom nd that the informer in that behalf might be
compelled to pay him his reasonable Costs on that Occasion and that he might have
Such other Relief in the Premisses as to this Court should seem meet

By the Court
Waller.




View as XML