The he also finds that Mr: Finch (the former
Receiver) did in the year 1714 Receive £12:10s: for A
Quarters Rent of Mr: Harrow in Paternoster Row
which was Omitted to be brought to the Hospitalls
Acct: That Mrs: Finch (our Cook) who is the
Widdow & Execr: of the said Mr: Finch and Mother
of the said John Barnett< no role > , hath Obliged herselfe
by a Writing under her hand since the said John
Barnett< no role > went away from the Hospll: to Answer
whatsoever should be found due from the said John
Barnett< no role > to the Hospll: And That as Exece: to Mr
Finch she is likewise Answer able for the said
£12:10s: But now pretends she is not Able to Discharge
any or but a very small part of the said Two Sumes
of money whereof the Hospll: has been so Wronged as
aforesaid. Whereupon this Comittee having fully
Debated and Considered the Case And taking Notice
that Mr: Trear hath within Two yeares last past recd:
and brought into his Accompt for the Use of the
Hospll: the Sume of £560:15s:9d: for Interest by him
made of the Hospitalls Cash in his hands and being
of Opinion That the Tennts: who have really & bona
side paid their Rents to said John Barnett< no role > or Mr:
Finch ought not in Justice to be required to pay
the same over againe

It is Ordered That the said Tennts: have
Creditt given in their respective Accompts for the
money which Appears to have been by the us
really paid as aforesaid to the said John Barnett< no role >
or Mr: Finch And that Mr. Trears Acct. be
Discharged of the said Sumes of £348:01s:02d: [..]
£12:10s: And of such further Sumes (if any there be)
as shall hereafter be Discovered to have been
received by the said John Barnett< no role > or Mr Finch