Thursday 9 Decr. 1725

{That the petitions of Mackress & Sparkes
be referred to the Justices in Edmonton
Division to report their Opinions theres on
the County day in the next Sessions &
to inquire whether the Conveying of Vagrants
can bedorecontracted for at less Expence

this Order was
drawn upon the
back of the peticon
of Richd. Prentice< no role >

{That at pusent & thattheit be refined
to the same Juties of the same Division to consider of a proper
Pson to succeed Richd Prentice< no role > as High Con-
stable & to report the same at the same
true

{That the Petition of Nich Ludford< no role > be referred
to the Justices of the same Division to Cook
unto the Demand in his Peticon & report
that Opinions upon it at the same time
The Peticon of Tirpin Mason< no role > rejected

{That a Commettie Etc appointed to look into
the Contract belive Etc this County & Brown
relatray to the Repairs of Chestsea Bridge
& to upon how for thes Contract bones the sd
Brown & [..] ye proper for the County to do
concerning the same, & Mr. Blead Mr Vennor
Mr Clithera Mr Bulstrode Mr Coles worth Mr
Jeffrey & the rest of the gentlemen in the [..] & all others that place to attend to
of the Commtt, & any 3 to make their Repr
the County day of next Sessions