Middlesex Sessions:
Sessions Papers - Justices' Working Documents
SM | PS

February 1794

About this document type

Currently Held: London Metropolitan Archives

LL ref: LMSMPS508940071

Image 71 of 124


Middlesex February Session 1794

Between
Saint Andrews Holborn above barsAppellants
and
Saint James Clerkenwell Respondents

Brief for Respondents

Case

The Examination of Elizth
Garton
< no role > taken the 17th. day of
Janry 1794

}
States That about 2 Years ago she was married by banns to her present Husband John
Garton
< no role > at the Parish Church of St. Mathew Bethnal Green

That about nine years ago her said Husband was bund apprentice to Mr. Thos
Bayless
< no role > of Brook St . in the Par of St Andrew. Holborn Furniture Japanner for the term
of Seven years as she believes

That her said Husband continued to live with the sd. Mr. Bayless in Brook St. afsd.
until sd. Mr. Bayless was burnt out by fire

That then as. Mr. Bayless removed to Waltons Court in the St Par of St. Andrew
Holborn above bars where Examinants Husband removed with him as she believes

That she hath been informed by her sd Husbanbd that he did not serve themhole
of the sd. term by Six months or thereabouts

That she hath been informed by her said Husband that he left his said Martin
by reason that he had not sufficient work to employ him and that the said Indenting
were can called by mutual Consent

That her said Husband hath not since his said Apprenticeship done any
Out whereby to gain bring If a Settlement elsewhere to her Knowledger

That she is become chargeable to the Part of St. James Clerkenwell

We Summise that an objection is taken to the order because that Waltons
Court is not within the Liberty of St. Andrew Holborn above barrs but below the bars
Your Attention is particularly requested to this Circumstance

Qr. Wstr. Walton's Court is in
the Appts. Par


Notice has ben given to produced the Pauper

This Appeal was adjourned in February Session at our request that we might he enabled to discover whetr. this pair of
Waltons Court wherein Paupers Husband reseded was in the City or County Liberty from the best information we have been able
to obtain We find it to be in the County Liberty but pays Taxes to the City as Appellts Solicitor informs us & that he has subpenald
the Sollietor of the City Liberty to whose Examination you are particularly requested to attend




View as XML