William Massey< no role > that your Petitioner should Breakfast Dine and Sup at
his Masters Table that he was neither to open or shut up the Shop or to do
any Work belonging to the Business of a laborious Nature

That your Petitioner has served upwards of Five years of his
Apprenticeship during which here he had his Meals regularly at his Masters
Table and was not required to perform any of the Laborious Work of the
Business until within these Three or Four Months when he was ordered by his
said Master to open Sweep, and shut up the Shop, and also to Clean and
Light the Lamps, which Works your Petitioner delivered doing urging that [..]
was contrary to the Agreement entered into by his Father on his Behalf

That in Consequence of this refusal your Petitioner was forbidden
coming to his Masters Dinner Table and was ordered to dine with the
Common Servants of the family but your Petitioner not being Conscious
of having given just Cause for this Order also declined obeying the same

That your Petitioner having from this time daily requested to
be permitted to dine at his Masters Table without Effect, has dined at his
Fathers House and Continues so to do.

That some short Time since it was agreed between your
Petitioners Father and his said Master that all Matters in dispute should be
referred to some Gentleman at the Bar and W Common Serjeant of
London was fixed on for that purpose who upon hearing all parties and
their Witnesses was of Opinion that your Petitioners Master had acted
improperly and advised him to receive your Petitioner back to his
Table and in future to abide by the Agreement at first Eeatered into