Middlesex Sessions:
Sessions Papers - Justices' Working Documents
SM | PS

1764

About this document type

Currently Held: London Metropolitan Archives

LL ref: LMSMPS505430061

Image 61 of 84


Of Matthew Wilder< no role > of Westminster Gent because he came not here to
prosecute the law with effect and give evidence or behalf of our Lord the King against Nicholas Miles< no role > in as
Case of Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged before G Garnon
Esquire one of the Justices of our Lord the King for the City and Liberty of
Westminster he undertook}
£xx

Of Edward Johnson< no role > of new Inn yard Hounsditch CooperMorris Holmes at John Bullocks< no role > Esqr in White Chapel Brewerbecause
he came not here to prosecute the law with Effect and give Evidence on behalf of our Lord the King against
David Johnson< no role > in a Case of Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged before Chris.
Scott
< no role > Esquire one of the Justices of our Lord the King for the County of Middlesex
he undertook Etc}

February Session 1764

this to come in
at bottom


Of Jane Douglas< no role > of Church Lane Sr. Martins Spintr because she came not
here to prosecute the law with effect and give Evidence or behalf of our Lord the King against George Wingfiled< no role >
in a Case of Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged before Saunders
Welch
< no role > Esquire one of the Justices of our Lord the King for the County of Middlesex
he undertook}
£xl

Of John Cooksey< no role > of Shire lane Labourer for the same£xl

Of Charles Andrews< no role > White Chapel Middx Victualler because he came not here
to prosecute the law with Effect and give evidence or behalf of our Lord the King against John Billingsley< no role > and Ann< no role >
his wife in a Case of Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged
before Chris Scott< no role > Esqr . one other of the Justices Etc he undertook}
£xl

Of Benj Benson< no role > of Queen Street St. Giles Smith because he came not here to
prosecute the law with Effect and give Evidence on behalf of our Lord the King against Henry Thrrowgood< no role > in a
Case of Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged before Saunders Welch< no role >
Esqr . one other of the Justices Etc he undertook}
£xl

Of Philip Vincent< no role > of Little Earl Street Brazier for the same£xl

Of Patrick Mc Downer< no role > of James Street< no role > Gent because he came not here to prosecute the law with Effect and evidence on behalf of our Lord the King agt.
Solomon Lovel< no role > [..] Recognizance taken and acknowledged before Henry Lambe< no role > Esqr . one other of the Justices Etc he undertook}
£xl

Of John Barlow< no role > of the Savo [..] Gent for the same£xl

Of John The Fields Servant to Mr. Blakney of St. James's Street because he came not
here to prosecute the law with Effect and give Evidence or behalf of our Lord the King against Thomas Etteridge< no role > in as
Case Felony as by a Recognizance taken and acknowledged before Sir John Fielding< no role >
Knight one other of the Justices Etc he undertook}
£xx

Of John McDonald< no role > of the three Tons in Glaze market because he came not here to
prosecute the law with effect and give Evidence of behalf of our Lord the King against John Downs< no role > in a Case of
Felony as by a Recognizance taken acknowledged as above he undertook}
£xx

Of Thomas Waifer< no role > of the same, for the same
£xx

Of William Fowkes< no role > of Gardiners Lane Westmr . Coachman because he came not here to
prosecute the law with effect and give evidence on behalf of our Lord the King against James young< no role > in a Case
of Felony as by a Recognizance taken as above he undertook}
xx




View as XML