Middlesex Sessions:
Sessions Papers - Justices' Working Documents
SM | PS

April 1750

About this document type

Currently Held: London Metropolitan Archives

LL ref: LMSMPS504020063

Image 63 of 921st March 1750


and he would have the Shilling paid him before he would Meddle, in the matter, And this (some times after) he had been told
the Crime was Felony and, when at the same time the Prisoner and Prosecutor Stood together before him the sd. Justice
And the prosecutor Offered to give Evidence and the Prisoner has Contest the Fact. But the payment of the sd. Shilling being
often disputed he the said Justice has Pretended that neither he himself or the Constable could Act Safely without taking
out such Warrant and sometimes the sd. Justice has required the Presecutor moreover to pay the Constable Six pence for
Serving such Warrant.

That Sometimes the Prosecutor has not been able to pay for such Warrant and the Constable (to get mid of his
Prisoner) has been obliged to Lend the Shilling.

That when One Hawkins was brought before him and charged with Feloniously Stealing Lead after the
Shilling Demanded and paid A Warrant was make out against Hawkins for Inspition of Felony and Presently
[..] the said Justice, declared he could Discharge, the prison and [..] Shilling parish Discharge [..]
Prisoner being unable to pay the Shilling the Justice Ordered him to the Round House, and told the Prisoner he should,
not be discharged until the said Shilling was paid and Accordingly he Ordered him to be put into the Round house, and he being
there and telling his Case a Collection was made (by some poor Women) towards his Discharge And then the Prisoner was took
back to the Justice who being informed how the Money was raised tho' the Collection did not Amount to a Shilling he took
the pence. So Collected and discharged the prisoner.

That One, Isaac Broad< no role > being brought before the sd Justice (after his Demanding & receiving a Shilling for his
Warrant) he Examined the prosecutor, But a Person earnestly desiring favour of the Prosecutor, on behalf of the Prisoner
the said Justice told the Prosecutor if he was not inclined to punish the Prisoner he might have the Warrant for Suspition
of Felony and then the Warrant might be discharged which being consented to such warrant was made out and thereupon.
the said Justice declared the said Prisoner discharged altho the Charge was directly for Felony and the Goods Stolen were
then produced by the Constable, However the Prisoner, refusing to pay a Shilling Demanded by the sd. Justice for his
Discharge he refused to Write such discharge (on his sd. Warrant)




View as XML