<div1 type="SM_PSpage" id="LMSMPS50957PS509570134"> <xptr type="pageFacsimile" doc="LMSMPS509570134"></xptr>
<p n="991">The facts are that Gainford did hire the Billiard r<obscured></obscured>
<lb></lb>
at 10/6 per Week & kept it for about 6 Weeks but he is not<lb></lb>
certain as to the time & the inclination of his mind<obscured></obscured>
<lb></lb>
that it was less than 6 Weeks rather than more, the<lb></lb>
rent however was infact paid for the Billiard Table, the Mace<obscured></obscured>
<lb></lb>
etc. a very small portion of it for the Room, which it let<lb></lb>
by itself makedly without any kind of furniture, would not<lb></lb>
as the Pauper says have let for<del>more</del>
than above 2/-<lb></lb>
Pr. Week at the most therefore the residue of the rent £ was<lb></lb>
Paid for the Case of the Table etc. it is however necessary<lb></lb>
to observe that<del>at</del>
during the time the Pauper occupied this Room<lb></lb>
he lodged in an apartment in a house in a place called<lb></lb>
<rs type="placeName" id="LMSMPS50957_geo549">Dean Row</rs>
<interp inst="LMSMPS50957_geo549" type="placeName" value="Dean Row"></interp>
<interp inst="LMSMPS50957_geo549" type="type" value="undefined"></interp>
in <rs type="placeName" id="LMSMPS50957_geo550">St. Georges Parish</rs>
<interp inst="LMSMPS50957_geo550" type="placeName" value="St. Georges Parish"></interp>
<interp inst="LMSMPS50957_geo550" type="type" value="undefined"></interp>
for which apartmt.<lb></lb>
& for a Bod 1/6 Pr. Week was paid, but whether it<lb></lb>
was the Room of the Pauper <rs type="occupation" id="LMSMPS50957_occ207">or of a Woman</rs>
<interp inst="LMSMPS50957_occ207" type="occupation" value="or of a Woman"></interp>
with<lb></lb>
whom he them cohabited is doultful, but supposing<lb></lb>
it to have been his & adding the 1/6 P Week paid for it<lb></lb>
(including Bedr.) to the 2/ Pr. Work the utmost worth<lb></lb>
of the Billiard Room if let unfurnished, they will not<lb></lb>
together make 10l. Pr. Amadm; (the amb. being 9.20)</p>
<p n="992">Besides We think the want of Proof of the actual<gap reason="illegible"></gap>
<lb></lb>
occupancy for 40 days is a decision objection, us the<lb></lb>
condence of it is very doubtful, indud<del>rather</del>
against<lb></lb>
it rather than the contrary and the law upon that head<lb></lb>
10c are convinced requires clear & positive Proof.</p>
<p n="993">3.6<lb></lb>
-13<lb></lb>
2.5.6<lb></lb>
4<lb></lb>
9.2.0<lb></lb>
<obscured></obscured>
</p>
</div1>

View as Text