Upon the Whole therefore the Appellants trust the Court must to cause
to quash the Order of Removal & they hope with the costs of the appeal & Maintenance
of the paupers since their Removal.

Proofs

To prove the Circumstances of the Apprenticeship as
stated that pauper never lived in Croydon with any other
person than his UncleCall}
The Pauper Char. Collier< no role > & Char. Collier< no role > his Master

To Produce the Memdern or Agreemt. (of necessary) Call. Chars. Collier< no role > the Master

To prove the Expences sustained by the parish of Creyden
in the Maintenance of the Paupers since their Removal
(if Necessary)Call}
One of the Overseers of Croydon

N.B The Counterpart of the Agreemt. before stabled to have been to a friend of
the paupers is certainly lost, the Master having within these five days made Appelnen
to the Son of the Person in whose custody it was (he being dead) who says he knows nothing
if it, & that he her reached amongst his fathers Papers & cannot find if

On Sewing the Respodts. Sodr. with the Order of Court made on Monday for hearing
their Appeal on Thursday it was hinted by him that he intended to contend the master
of the court in hearing the Appeal as to allodges are have but are lots pass without lodging
an Appeal: If this really was the case we certainly are two late, but the
not being removed till the 6th Novr.it is persumed use are clearly in lesser as His present is undoubledly did not Youl
Quar Sess, after,for he' (as it is understood) the Magistrates in Midsex hold Our Sess
every six Weeks, for the bother Dispatch of Business Accountdon of the Sinster, get Surely
such Circumstances cannot be converted into the Mean of Rebarring Sistant Parishes) who
and ignorant of the local Practices) of their right of Appeal given them by an Act of a
Parlianint. which expressly deints the histes. to hold their Sess poor tund in ye.