1st Novr. 1717.
Pund & dd
WelboneJohn< no role > This name instance is in set 777.
P sr
Wm Withers< no role >
being charged by
Henry
Haukey< no role >
at ye Golden Ball
in Fenchurch Street
Goldsmith
for
picking his pockett of a handkerchiefe of Small value
dd
BartonAnn< no role >
P doold Prisoner
cont to Labor for a week
WebbElizabeth< no role >
P dobeing charged by
George
Hale< no role >
next ye Queens head
in Shoe Lane
, and
John Wright< no role >
in Queens Arms Alley
in Shoe Lane
being a disorderly woman
& Seduceing their apprentices and
Mary Boules< no role >
at ye 3
Nuns
in Fleetstreet
Linnen Draper
on Suspition of
haveing taken 3 Sheets 2 Aprons and other things
dd
FulhamJane< no role >
P dobeing charged by
Elizabeth
Cox< no role >
at ye white horse Inn
at Cripplegate
widdow
for that being
her servant
She pawned her Mistress pettycoate and for further
examination being suspected to have imbezled other things
Cont to Labor
PhillipsElizabeth< no role >
P dobeing charged by
Ann
Renter< no role >
in Pauls Alley
Red Cross Street
Sign of ye 5 Shoes
for takeing a shift of her Line with an intent to have
Stolne it
dd
JonesMary< no role >
P dobeing charged by
Jno
Burnett< no role >
at Mr. Starkeys in Holyday yard
in Creed Lane
with comeing up into his Chamber & attempting to carry off
a Hatt and a Rydeing Hood which he'es ready to affirme
dd
FilewoodEster< no role >
P dobeing charged by
Wm.
Doyle< no role >
at ye Crown and Cusheon
in Bishop gate Street
Vintner
on Strong presumption of haveing picked his Letter
Case out of his pockett and being of no reputation
Burnham Jno< no role >
. Artsmaster
his Security proposd}
The following persons being proposed by
John Burnham< no role >
Weaver
one of the Artsmasters
of this Hospital to be his Security vizt.
John Ford< no role >
Coachmaker
in Piccadilly
near St Jamess Church
SavillBaker< no role >
in Lamb alley
Bishopsgate Street
Ex. Kal
It is Ordered that it be referred to the Comee of this house to enquire
into the Characters of ye said Ford and Savill and to Report their
Opinion to this Court